It's official. You no longer have to be overweight to be a fat cyclist. In fact, starting today there's a whole new meaning to acknowledging that you are a fat cyclist.
Let me fill you in on the back story. In April, Elden Nelson, author of the popular Fat Cyclist blog, learned that his wife Susan was stricken with a serious form of cancer. Of course, Fatty's (as he calls himself) fans, being cyclists and all, rallied to his side in support with well-wishes delivered through comments on his blog as well as cards.
Not only that, but Twin Six, the hippest jersey maker in the industry, rolled out a limited edition Team Fatty jersey and companion gear in support of Elden and his wife, but also to fight cancer in general. All of the proceeds of Team Fatty gear will be split between covering Susan's medical expenses and recovery trip (she wants to visit Italy once she is well enough) and the Lance Armstrong Foundation (and if you've ever had doubts about the good an organization like this can have, read this account from Elden). Now how's that for cool?
So everybody say it with me out loud:
I want to help help a fellow bike blogger - I am a fat cyclist.
I want to save a life - I am a fat cyclist.
I want to cure cancer - I am a fat cyclist.
I am proud to be a fat cyclist.
Now...get yourself a jersey (they are for both men and women) and wear it to your next race or club ride, and do it with pride, you hear! Thank you.
What's up with this year's IMBA Report Card?
Let me start by saying that IMBA kicks ass! The organization has worked tirelessly to grow mountain biking and help it gain the level of respect it now enjoys above many other trail user groups. This has been particularly true the last couple of years since Mike Van Abel took over as executive director. During this time he has refocused the mission of IMBA, repositioned the organization with professional branding, and has embraced freeriding and developed whole new programs to help this aspect of the sport.
I've always been impressed at the tools the organization has provided to regional mountain bike associations to help them advance the cause. Which brings me to the annual IMBA Report Card. One of the mainstays of the regional advocacy tool set, the IMBA Report Card provided a grade - as judged by riders - to the state of mountain biking in every state or province in North America. IMBA suggested that regional organizations use this grade to help advocate with local officials. If your grade was good you could reinforce the great work that had been done over the past year. If your grade was bad, you could more easily build a case for a disaffected constituent group. (Read my post on this year's report card survey for more on this).
This year, however, IMBA, somewhat inexplicably, decided not to provide the full report card for each of the regions. Instead it chose to highlight the best and worst locations based on their grades, saying only that:
What about every area in between? Don't we at least deserve to know the grade?
The real question is why would IMBA suddenly change course this way after eight years of producing the report card? Speculating for a minute; my guess is that either there were too few votes for the poll to be meaningful, or the results were so wildly different region to region based on prior years that it would call the polling methodology into question.
Is it just me, or do others find this a bit odd?
Posted by Graham in Advocacy, Commentary | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)