« December 2006 | Main | February 2007 »
Editors: An End Has a Start
Too new to review.
Bat for Lashes: Fur & Gold
Too new to review.
The Chemical Brothers: We Are the Night
Like the electronica I made in the basement, but better. (***)
Interpol: Our Love to Admire
Hit the trifecta... (****)
ATB: Trilogy
ATB meets Til Tuesday. More vocals than Trance. (***)
LCD Soundsystem: Sound of Silver
Slow 70s groove, with a mix of 80s synth. (****)
The Frames: The Cost
Slow folk, nothing earth shattering. (**)
Modest Mouse: We Were Dead Before the Ship Even Sank
Save me from the banal shit that's out right now. (*****)
Aberdeen City: The Freezing Atlantic
Listenable, but not powerful enough. (***)
Heartless Bastards: All This Time
Modern day Janis Joplin. (***)
Gnarls Barkley: St. Elsewhere
Funkadelic mo-shizzle (****)
Lily Allen: Alright Still
Cockney punk princess has bike and attitude. (****)
Miss Kittin: Live at Sonar
Purring with an 80's electro sexual energy (****)
Angels and Airwaves: We Don't Need to Whisper
Blink 182 but better (****)
The Streets: The Hardest Way to Make an Easy Living
More of the same. Two Nations stands out. (***)
Dan Waxman: Ultra Electro
Remixes of old faves...New Order, Depeche, Daft Punk...just ok. (***)
Snow Patrol: Eyes Open
Rich album that builds on the first. Great sophomore effort. (****)
Editors: Back Room
Maybe better then Interpol (*****)
Morrissey: Ringleader Of The Tormentors
Truly disappointing. (**)
De/Vision: Subkutan
Depeche Mode with and industrial dance edge (****)
Know any good designers? Mountain Bike Action Magazine needs you...
I noticed this thread in the MTBR.com forums bashing Mountain Bike Action (MBA) Magazine and figured I'd pile it on too. Why not take your medicine in one dose, right? Well, actually I meant to post this a while back when I wrote about cycling logos, but I got distracted and the MTBR thread reminded me...so here it goes...
A few weeks ago I wrote about 8 great cycling logos after being inspired by an article in an issue of MBA. In that very same article, however, MBA analyzed it's own logo. They admitted that they don't like it. In fact, here's what they said:
Huh? You know your logo is hideous and yet you choose to do nothing about it. Isn't that the definition of insanity?
So let's break this down. MBA's logo is:
They cite as a reason not to change the "millions of riders" familiar with the logo. First of all, this is quite an exaggeration - the largest cycling mag in the U.S. has just a hair over 400,000 readers a year, and I'm certain MBA does not have that kind of reach. Nonetheless, I get their point, they believe they have brand equity that manifests itself in the logo.
Ok, now couple that ugly logo with their disastrous Web site and amateurish print layout and you've got one train-wreck of a magazine.
You can't tell me, MBA, that you are realizing significant growth in your circulation (I can't seem to find your circulation figures anywhere). I'd venture to guess that your circulation is sliding along with most every other print publication out there.
Therefore it is time to be bold and go where many others have gone before you. It would not be the first time that an established player in an industry refreshed its design and emerged stronger than before. (In fact, take a look at the Brand New blog if you need some case studies and inspiration.)
I haven't even broached the subject of content or Web strategy, but I've ranted enough for now. I'll leave that to subsequent posts on the subject. Don't worry though, you're not the only one...this is an equal opportunity blog.
Posted by Graham in Commentary | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)